San francisco fed simulation

Stay connected with our monthly newsletter. Have a question or just want to say hi? Skip to content. How should I interpret and use this GDP number? What does it mean for my state? Can I cite this number in a report? What do you mean by zero-sum game? It looks like the gender gaps are larger than the racial gaps. Why are they bigger? Does this mean that we should prioritize closing gender gaps?

What if I want to know the estimated gain to GDP for the country as a whole? Why does this simulation have only state-level geographies? We engage with educators and students, focusing on real-life applications of economics and personal finance. In order to help protect the health and well-being of our employees and the communities we serve, our tour program is suspended until further notice. For news and updates on tours as they are available, please sign up to our email list.

Specific requests or questions can be emailed to tours sf. Reset All. Economic Research. Players assume the role of Fed Chair and adjust the federal funds rate to try to achieve low inflation and low unemployment. If successful, they are reappointed to another term. By investigating anonymous user data from a three-month period in , we find that about 20 percent of games completed result in reappointment.

Chances of reappointment improve with game experience; however, players exhibit more skill in addressing some situations than others. Given the widespread interest in the game, reflected by over 80, games initiated per month, the implications of the game for improving economic literacy are important. Chair the Fed is an award-winning online simulation developed by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco to teach about the role of the Fed in achieving its dual mandate goals of stable prices and maximum employment.

It is widely used, with an average of close to 85, games started each month in We find that students who played Chair the Fed score significantly higher on a question posttest compared with students who learned about the Fed and monetary policy in more traditional ways.

In evaluating our results, we compare difference-in-difference regression modeling with the traditional economic education model where the posttest score is regressed on the pretest score, and find that our results are robust across both specifications.

This paper analyzes the dynamical properties of monetary models with regime switching. We start with the analysis of the evolution of inflation when policy is guided by a simple monetary rule where coefficients switch with the policy regime. And what are the driving forces of these price increases we've seen? Well, they're going to last as long as Covid is with us because Covid is causing the supply chain bottlenecks that we see across the globe. Those are translating into price increases that are eye-popping in some categories.

That's what I mean by 'not expected to persist,' is that they're Covid-related and, as Covid subsides, we would expect those pressures to ease.

We'll be back to the fundamental dynamics of the economy where inflation is much more related to the strength of the labor market and the overall strength of the economy than it is to being buoyed around or boosted by temporary price increases in used cars, which you couldn't expect to persist.

The rate of inflation on used cars can't continue to go on like this forever because it will But right now, we have bottlenecks in semiconductors. That is Covid-related. Chatterley: Yeah, the brilliant thing about you is you always sort of make it human, and the impact that we're seeing on individuals The point I think where price rises are impacting people's ability to feed their families, for example, or afford the basic things that they need on a daily basis Are we late?

Is the Federal Reserve late in tackling prices for those reasons? Daly: [W]hen we think of people, we think of two things Covid-related price increases versus jobs. And I'm committed to doing both, right? Achieving price stability, which is people can count on prices not rising at these rapid rates we've been seeing down the road. And also making sure that they can come back to work when it's safe — that they feel it's safe to do so when they're not dealing with child care and other kinds of constraints that make it hard to come back to work.

This is what we mean when we say achieving the dual mandate. And if we would pull back on accommodation for the economy, pull back our support, bridle the economy, it's probably not going to solve the supply chain bottlenecks. In fact, I would wager a bet that it won't solve the supply chain bottlenecks.

One of the things I caution us all to do is not think the Fed can do everything or that we're behind because we see a rise in gas or food prices that isn't expected to persist beyond when Covid is on our shores. A customer selects goods at a supermarket in New York, on Aug. Chatterley: We still have 6 million people that are out of jobs compared to when we entered the pandemic